Integral EdTech Studio

When learning exists — but action doesn't follow

We help organisations connect learning with real work. Together, we design how content, practice, support and technology will help people carry out a task, and how to check the result.

Learning architecture visualization
Scroll

Formats for your situation

Send a few lines about your situation. We will arrange a short conversation and discuss which format might help. Preparation is optional, and you decide separately whether to buy a service.

Learning-to-Action QuickScan

A focused 90-minute working session for one course, onboarding flow, or AI-enabled learning experience.

You receive a one-page map identifying the main risk to applying learning, one reversible change, the person responsible and a date to check it.

Format overview

Learning-to-Work Gap Review

Understand one work task before investing in a larger intervention.

A short decision brief within two working days after the session: required action, possible causes, missing evidence and a recommended next step.

Format overview

Learning System Diagnostic

Examine one working process to decide where an investment in learning or working conditions is justified.

You receive an 8–15 page report comparing observations, options and risks. We review it together in a decision workshop and recommend a next step.

Format overview

Working Pilot From Learning to Performance

Over 4–6 weeks, test one change that may help a group apply learning in a real working process.

You receive a working part of the solution, records of the test and a decision to continue, change or stop. A limited set of learning materials and practice support is included when agreed in the scope.

Format overview
How to start

About the Studio

Integral EdTech Studio

We design organisational learning so that content, practice and support work together around the tasks people need to perform.

Information alone does not produce action. The quality of outcomes depends on who is learning, how practice is structured, what conditions support transfer, and how well roles, feedback loops and economics are aligned.

When learning does not lead to action, more content may not be the answer. We examine where the learning process diverges from the skills, tools, authority and support the work requires.

The Studio helps your team investigate those gaps, design and test a response, and learn to maintain the resulting system.

EdTech companies Corporate L&D Professional communities Knowledge-intensive organizations

We work on the conditions that support learning and its use at work. We do not promise to transform employees or assume that a new course or platform will solve the problem.

Studio working principle

What we work on

  • Learning-to-action systems as a whole
  • Gaps between learning and behavior change
  • Alignment of content, practice and workflow
  • Assessment architecture and evidence design
  • Technology as delivery infrastructure

Services

What we design

We help your team investigate the problem, design and test a response, and maintain the system independently.

01

Systems Diagnostics

We analyze the current learning-to-action system: where the gap between learning and action lies, what creates it, and what can actually be changed.

02

Learning/Practice/Transfer Architecture

We design the structure: sequence, formats, roles, feedback cycles and conditions for transfer to real work.

03

Assessment & Evidence Design

We build an assessment system that measures what actually changes — not just attendance and completion rates.

04

Human-Centered AI & Data Governance

We help organizations use data and AI tools to support learning — without displacing human judgment from the process.

05

Implementation & Adoption

We accompany the rollout: from pilot to stable operation, with attention to resistance, roles and operational realism.

06

Handover & Capability Building

We help your team learn to maintain and develop the system independently, with documents and working practices they can use after the project.

How We Work

Process

We begin by understanding the task and agree how the client's team will take over the work at the end.

01

Preliminary conversation

We understand the organization's context, request and current situation. We determine whether working together makes sense — and if so, in what form.

02

Diagnostics

We examine the system: interviews, analysis of existing materials and metrics, structural observations. We formulate hypotheses about the nature of the gap.

03

Architecture design

Together with the client's team, we develop the learning-to-action system: formats, sequence, roles, assessment and transfer conditions.

04

Pilot and adaptation

We run a limited pilot, collect evidence, and adapt the architecture to real conditions before scaling.

05

Handover

We document the system logic, train the team, build internal support processes. We assess readiness for independent operation.


Who We Work With

Organizations where learning must change action

We work with organizations where the gap between knowledge and behavior is a real operational problem.

🎓

EdTech companies

EdTech products, training centers, professional schools — for whom learning outcomes are their core market promise.

🏢

Corporate L&D teams

Learning and development teams that need to see whether learning helps employees carry out important tasks.

🔬

Expert communities

Professional associations, guilds, communities of practice — where the transmission of knowledge and maintenance of standards is a core function.

⚙️

Knowledge-intensive organizations

Companies where quality of work critically depends on people's ability to apply complex knowledge in non-standard situations.

When we can't help

  • The task is to motivate people to learn, not change the system
  • The solution is already decided (platform, format) — just needs "content"
  • The core problem is personal change in employees, not systemic conditions
  • No readiness for diagnostics and piloting before scaling

Founder

Georgii Bakhtiyarov

I built Integral EdTech Studio as the third direction of the Askesis metaproject — alongside Askesis Academy (learning and capability development) and Coaching Practice (individual accompaniment).

Across the three projects, we ask how understanding becomes action. We examine practice, working conditions, feedback and responsibilities, then use observations to review the result. The Studio applies this approach to organisational learning.

Working in Russian and English.

Connected directions

  • Askesis Academy — learning and developing capacity for practice — askesis.academy
  • Coaching Practice — individual accompaniment of a situated request — georgii.coach

Getting Started

Have a challenge — let's talk

In the first conversation, we clarify your context and task and discuss whether working together would help.

How to start

Send a few lines about your situation. We will arrange a short conversation and discuss which format might help. Preparation is optional, and you decide separately whether to buy a service.

Formats for your situation · Write to Georgii